<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>midlifecareerstrategy.com &#187; wall street journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://midlifecareerstrategy.com/blog/archives/tag/wall-street-journal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://midlifecareerstrategy.com/blog</link>
	<description>Career Planning for Midcareer Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal recommends bogus test</title>
		<link>http://midlifecareerstrategy.com/blog/archives/170</link>
		<comments>http://midlifecareerstrategy.com/blog/archives/170#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CathyG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[career tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myers-briggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midlifecareerstrategy.com/blog/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s WSJ includes a retirement living section. It seems that some of the over-60 set can&#8217;t handle all that leisure and they need help figuring out what to do. One woman sought help from a career counselor who administered the Strong Interest Inventory and the notorious Myers-Briggs. The WSJ article included helpful tips on taking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmidlifecareerstrategy.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F170"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmidlifecareerstrategy.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F170&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Today&#8217;s WSJ includes a retirement living section. It seems that some of the over-60 set can&#8217;t handle all that leisure and they need help figuring out what to do.</p>
<p>One woman sought help from a career counselor who administered the Strong Interest Inventory and the notorious Myers-Briggs.  The WSJ article included helpful tips on taking the test: you can pay $100-$300 to work with a counselor and discuss results.</p>
<p>The article failed to note that Myers-Briggs has been largely discredited (despite widespread use). You might as well check in with a good astrologer.</p>
<p>Frankly, I can&#8217;t believe so many organizations (including universities) continue to use Myers-Briggs. See</p>
<p>http://www.skepdic.com/myersb.html</p>
<p>Responding to some of this criticism, a person associated with a university says,  &#8216;It is  perception-based and is therefore subject to threats to validity&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>http://world.std.com/~lo/95.07/0081.html</p>
<p>The Strong Interest Inventory may be a better test&#8230;but I remain skeptical. Before paying anybody to take tests, I would invest in a copy of Annie Paul&#8217;s excellent book, The Cult of Personality.</p>
<p>A while back I wrote an article about how people <em>really</em> change careers. Read it <a href="http://www.midlifecareerstrategy.com/testing.html" title="How People Really Change Careers">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://midlifecareerstrategy.com/blog/archives/170/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

